Rss

  • redit
  • delicious
  • stumble
  • youtube

Archives for : Bruce Willis

Looper

January 3, 2013

It Doesn’t Exactly Rewrite History

Looper is a movie that’s been on my radar for quite some time.  It’s about mafia-types who are involved in time travel for the sake of eliminating unwanted “garbage,” and it features both the formidable Bruce Willis and Nightwing himself, Joseph Gordon-Levitt.  Because I don’t have quite as much free time as I used to, I had to skip this one in theaters.  When it finally trickled down the DVD/Blu-ray format earlier this week, however, I was all over it.

This is the perfect example of a movie that quietly made its way into cinemas without having an overabundance of pomp and circumstance paving the way.  I’d taken a fleeting interest in it upon reading about the movie’s story line, but it wasn’t until a multitude of friends took to Facebook in order to sing its unparalleled praises that I genuinely took interest.  And, I have to say, though solidly crafted it is, I found the movie to be a bit of a letdown.  Let me explain why.

With any time travel flick, one expects there to be plenty of mind-bending timelines that crisscross with one another (heck, they may even congeal into something indecipherable in the final moments, but the goal is to keep the audience playing the “prediction” game throughout).  While Looper does this, I found it far too easy to foresee how things would play out (this was in stark contrast to 12 Monkeys, Willis’ other time travel movie).  To delve into the specifics of this would put me at risk of including spoilers in my review, so suffice it to say that, though well written, there was nothing Earth-shattering about our protagonists’ concluding revelation.  Another point of contention—and one that has been widely discussed, I believe—was the decision to drown JGL in make-up so as to make him resemble a young Willis.  At times, it works, but more often than not I found it nearly impossible to not envision the actor with his true face.  Would it have been better to simply allow JGL to be, well, himself, and to sparingly use CGI to fill in the awkward transition moments during his character’s life?  I don’t know.  Still, I can’t ignore the fact that the make-up was more of a distraction than a boon.

Actually, I think Looper‘s greatest strength is its focus on the development of telekinesis as a part of the human genome in the not too distant future.  Some of the film’s best moments come as a result of this plot point, and I wish a little more focus on this would have been the order of the day.

Please don’t misunderstand me.  Looper is far better than the vast majority of drivel that Hollywood allows to make it past the stages of early drafting, and it makes for perfectly good viewing for anyone who enjoys sci-fi.  Just don’t expect it to rewrite history.

out of 5

Red

October 30, 2010

Director: Robert Schwentke

Starring: Bruce Willis, Morgan Freeman, John Malkovich, Helen Mirren, Mary-Louise Parker

Release Date: October 15, 2010

Fogies with Skills + Large Weapons + Laughs = WIN

Over the past few years there seems to have been an endless slew of goofy, so-ridiculous-they-verge-on-camp action films pummeling our nation’s theaters.  Red, a movie one might predict fits the preceding description perfectly, is not, in fact, so campy it’s dumb.  Quite the contrary.  It’s actually a competent, accessible little offering that’s stuffed with genuinely hilarious moments.  It also affords us the chance to see some of the most talented actors in the business sticking it to “The Man” with an array of really big guns.

The plot follows a group of former CIA operatives who have been targeted for assassination.  Red-movie-poster-Mary-Louise-ParkerWhy the Agency has decided to take them out is the question of the hour, and the answer leads our heroes through a series of narrative twists and turns that aren’t altogether unpredicatable.  But, as the saying goes, it’s not about the destination—it’s about the journey.

And for the most part, this journey is breezy stuff.  A more resonant subtext regarding a peron’s ability (or inability) to adjust to “being put out to pasture” is constantly bubbling just below the surface, but it seems that screenwriters Jon and Eric Hoeber were cognizant enough to realize that audiences don’t necessarily want a sermon about getting old.  No, what we want is a hearty helping of mayhem as dispatched by as stellar a cast as one could hope for.

Of particular note is John Malkovich.  His frazzled persona—which feeds on exactly the sort of post 9/11 paranoia that will likely define this generation—is hysterical (and, more often than not, completely justified).

Willis is his usual confident self, delivering steely glares and never flinching as cars, buildings, and broom closets explode on cue.  Freeman brings his always reliable grandfatherly presence, and Mirren is as charming as ever (even as she assaults limos with 50 caliber turrets and sub machine guns).

In the end, Red isn’t an action/comedy game-changer.  There aren’t any especially flashy directorial cues, and the plot isn’t exactly original.

But none of that really matters, does it?

All it needed to be was fun.  And it is.

What more could you ask for?

redstar24redstar24redstar24redstar24  out of 5

 

–Chris Flowers

Surrogates

September 26, 2009

Director: Jonathan Mostow

Starring: Bruce Willis, Ving Rhamessurrogates_movie_poster1

Release Date: September 25, 2009

Upon seeing the trailers for Surrogates, I was struck with an overwhelming sense of mediocrity.  The resemblance to 2004′s I, Robot was uncanny, and it seemed that the entire plot of the movie had already been revealed (as seems to happen so often with overly-indulgent coming attraction spots).  Still, though, I was interested—there’s a lot of possibility regarding the action that could come of robotic avatars flipping cars, crashing through buildings, etc.  It also looked like the type of movie that’d be brimming with symbolism.  With the exception of District 9 and Children of Men—which is, of course, already 3 years old—there’s been a signficant drop off in the production of “thinking man” sci-fi films.  So, for lack of a better option this weekend, I decided to go check this out.

As it turns out, Surrogates is, in fact, strikingly similar to I, Robot.  It’s safe to say that there’s a little more subtext woven into the fabric of Bruce Willis’ latest, but, all-in-all, it’s a ho-hum, surprisingly hollow affair.

Bruce Willis plays Tom Greer, a detective trying to identify a man who somehow managed to kill two people who were using surrogates.  Greer blandly goes about his work as a sleuth, and it’s revealed that he has some personal struggles (that, quite frankly, aren’t all that original).  He lost his son in a car accident, and he feels disconnected—in this case quite literally—from his wife, who refuses to interact with him without using her surrogate self.

And what is a “surrogate,” you ask?

In the not too distant future, the vast majority of humanity has opted to live out their daily lives by remotely controlling a robot whose physical appearance can be molded to fit their tastes.  In order to lend a sense of realism to this notion, the opening credits give us a brief history of surrogate technology: a monkey that’s missing an arm uses is it to grasp a piece of fruit, thus making it the ultimate prosthetic; there’s some mention of its usefulness on the battlefield, which is very briefly explored at a later time; the Supreme Court passes a law which allows humans to use surrogates 24/7 for anything and everything; so on and so forth, until we’re all bitter, wrinkled shells of our former physical selves.

As you’d imagine, there are a lot of good ideas floating around in Surrogates.  For whatever reason, though, the movie is just never really able to mesh them into something that’s engrossing or as thought-provoking as it should be.  Tom Greer’s backstory is so run-of-the-mill that it borders on being laughable, and we’re never really given a chance to connect/identify with his situation. Moving at a breakneck 88 minutes, the whole thing feels more episodic in nature than it does a full length feature film. The pacing is often mired by plodding tedium at times as well, which is oddly contrasted by the convenient, very “Hollywood” final act that we all see coming from 10 miles away.

As much as I hate to do this to Bruce, I have to mention the action (or lack thereof).

I mean, come on—the movie has robotic humanoids that are able to perform hyperkinetic maneuvers and sustain a reasonable amount of damage without shutting down, but the worst that ever happens to any of them is that they’re shot with handguns or hit by cars.  Even our protagonist, played by the one and only John “yippe-ki-yay!” McClain, is only involved in one surprisingly tame chase sequence and a helicopter crash that results in mild robotic disfigurement.

So, despite a plethora of good ideas and one or two well-choregraphed scenes, there’s not much here to warrant a night out at the movies.  Does it deserve a rental?  Yeah, I think so.  Well…maybe. I hate to waffle, but this will either be a “Yeah, I liked it” or “Meh, it was okay” encounter for most people.  If you do decide to take this one on, though, be aware of the fact that this is not a sci-fi/action extravaganza.  Really, it’s a traditional solve-the-mystery story set in a sci-fi world.  And there’s nothing wrong with that.  It’s just too bad the mystery couldn’t have been more enjoyable.

redstar1redstar1redstar1 out of 5

–Chris Flowers

Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violence, disturbing images, language, sexuality and a drug-related scene.