Rss

  • redit
  • delicious
  • stumble
  • youtube

Archives for : Morgan Freeman

Dreamcatcher

February 5, 2011

A Nightmare

Let’s play a game.  I’m going to list dreamcatchersome plot points from Dreamcatcher, and you’ll respond with the first word that comes to mind.  Ready?  Here we go.

  1. Intergalactic eels that infect a human host and eventually escape through said person’s anus.
  2. Telepathic extra-terrestrials who crack jokes in a British accent.
  3. Telepathic humans who use handguns to make phone calls.

These three things (more or less) sum up the massive failure of a novel-turned-movie that Lawrence Kasdan unleashed upon the world in 2003.  It’s clunky, awkwardly staged, and as disjointed as some pour soul who’s taken a tumble down Solomon’s staircase.

I’ll try to make this as painless as possible, so here goes my attempt to summarize the “story.”  Four friends who saved a mentally challenged peer from ridicule at a young age are granted extrasensory powers.  When they’re older, they use these abilities to excel at their professions.  Eventually, they realize they’re part of a larger effort to stop the spread of a blood-thirsty alien race who wants nothing more than to unleash it’s malignant slug offspring into the water supply of the City of Boston.

Besides the fact that the movie is anything but scary, it’s got some of the worst acting I’ve seen in quite some time.  On top of that, Star Wars style screen-wipes are suddenly thrown into the mix about halfway through.  These inadvertently create a much more lighthearted tone than Stephen King (or anyone else involved) could have possibly intended.

Then there’s the decision to focus on a small group of friends for the first third of the film.  This actually has some promise, as the audience is primed for an isolated psychological thriller that allows the inner “beasts” of each of these characters to be fully developed (and eventually released).

But that’s not what happens.

Instead, we’re forced to watch various military officials bark orders at one another and spill everything they know about the impending infection.  Whatever happened to “show, don’t tell?”

I haven’t even mentioned the hilariously terrible helicopter battle that ensues between Morgan Freeman and Tom Sizemore (and, before that, gelatinous aliens pretending to be good guys), but take my word for it.

This movie sucks.

goose-egg out of 5

–Chris Flowers

Check out “the phone call“.

Red

October 30, 2010

Director: Robert Schwentke

Starring: Bruce Willis, Morgan Freeman, John Malkovich, Helen Mirren, Mary-Louise Parker

Release Date: October 15, 2010

Fogies with Skills + Large Weapons + Laughs = WIN

Over the past few years there seems to have been an endless slew of goofy, so-ridiculous-they-verge-on-camp action films pummeling our nation’s theaters.  Red, a movie one might predict fits the preceding description perfectly, is not, in fact, so campy it’s dumb.  Quite the contrary.  It’s actually a competent, accessible little offering that’s stuffed with genuinely hilarious moments.  It also affords us the chance to see some of the most talented actors in the business sticking it to “The Man” with an array of really big guns.

The plot follows a group of former CIA operatives who have been targeted for assassination.  Red-movie-poster-Mary-Louise-ParkerWhy the Agency has decided to take them out is the question of the hour, and the answer leads our heroes through a series of narrative twists and turns that aren’t altogether unpredicatable.  But, as the saying goes, it’s not about the destination—it’s about the journey.

And for the most part, this journey is breezy stuff.  A more resonant subtext regarding a peron’s ability (or inability) to adjust to “being put out to pasture” is constantly bubbling just below the surface, but it seems that screenwriters Jon and Eric Hoeber were cognizant enough to realize that audiences don’t necessarily want a sermon about getting old.  No, what we want is a hearty helping of mayhem as dispatched by as stellar a cast as one could hope for.

Of particular note is John Malkovich.  His frazzled persona—which feeds on exactly the sort of post 9/11 paranoia that will likely define this generation—is hysterical (and, more often than not, completely justified).

Willis is his usual confident self, delivering steely glares and never flinching as cars, buildings, and broom closets explode on cue.  Freeman brings his always reliable grandfatherly presence, and Mirren is as charming as ever (even as she assaults limos with 50 caliber turrets and sub machine guns).

In the end, Red isn’t an action/comedy game-changer.  There aren’t any especially flashy directorial cues, and the plot isn’t exactly original.

But none of that really matters, does it?

All it needed to be was fun.  And it is.

What more could you ask for?

redstar24redstar24redstar24redstar24  out of 5

 

–Chris Flowers

Invictus

December 11, 2009

Director: Clint Eastwood

Starring: Morgan Freeman, Matt Damon

Release Date: December 11, 2009

I Think He Wants Us to Win the World Cup

Over the past few weeks, the world has seen the release of two very well made sports movies.  First we received The Blind Side, and now Invictus, the latest from Clint Eastwood.  The 79 year old actor—whose best known for his roles as grizzled lawmen—has certainly proven his ability as a filmmaker during his twilight years, and Invictus is no exception.  Thankfully, he doesn’t seem to be slowing down one iota.

Invictus tells the story of Nelson Mandela (Freeman), the former President of South Africa and the man credited with unifying a country riddled with racism and turmoil in the wake of apartheid._12569268388040 Given Mandela’s astonishing achievements, one would think the movie would be laden with dramatic flashbacks that clearly highlight the struggle he suffered as a prisoner for 27 years. Eastwood, it seems, has decided to take a different approach to telling this story.

The catalyst for this particular tale is rugby; a sport that many Americans know nothing about (admittedly, I knew little about the game going into the theater, but I did feel as if I had a better grasp of the sport as a whole when I walked out).  This could easily be viewed in a negative way, as the bulk of the third act is focused solely on the rugby World Cup match that took place in 1995. Eastwood clearly revels in the brutality of the sport, as it nicely symbolizes the struggle the country was going through at that time.  When teams lock arms and spar over field position, it’s clear just how painful the process is, and this adds even more depth to the same issues that—unlikely as it is—District 9 grappled with only a few months earlier.

Matt Damon plays Francois Pienaar, captain of the South African rugby team.  This is a role that seems well-suited to Damon, whose solemn determination is exactly what Mandela needed as a face for the symbolic triumph over prejudice that he saw embodied in the competition.  The acting honors, however, clearly go to Freeman.  If there’s anyone who was destined to play Mandela, it’s him—Freeman’s mastery of the man’s mannerisms, accent, and general presence is astounding.  There aren’t really any scenes that call for the emotional outbursts typically needed to garner an Oscar nod, but I have a feeling the sheer power of the movie as a whole will land Freeman a much deserved nomination.

That’s the thing about Invictus–at its core, it seems to be nothing more than an inspirational sports film, but there are many other issues rippling just beneath the surface.  One could nitpick about the decision to film this “documentary style,” with only limited (extremely limited) glimpses into Mandela’s past, and I’d have to agree that it leaves a little bit of a hole in an otherwise absorbing movie.  The message it sends to audiences, though, is what makes the final product so effective.  And that, of course, is that athletics play a very important role in any society: they act as the ultimate unifying medium.  Themes of bias and discrimination generate a lot tension, but when the final match is underway, everyone puts their differences aside (and inadvertently comes to the realization that we’re all one and the same).

As far as motivational sports films go, you could do a lot worse, and the patient directorial eye of Eastwood will cause you to linger on every frame.  I wouldn’t say the movie is unforgettable, but it is a welcome pick-me-up that takes an optimistic stance on the nature of mankind.

redstar1redstar1redstar1redstarhalfout of 5

–Chris Flowers

Rated PG-13 for brief strong language.

Check out the trailer for Invictus: